Bitcoin options do not increase the value of BTC.

Main Receptors:

Covered calls have received significant interest as cash and carry returns fall, but the data shows that they are not structurally suppressing Bitcoin's value.

A stable call ratio and rising demand suggest that hedging and leverage strategies coexist with aggressive positioning.

When the price of Bitcoin (BTC) went into a slump in November, traders began to theorize why institutional earnings and corporate stocks were unable to sustain price levels above $110,000.

One oft-cited explanation is the growing interest in Bitcoin alternatives, particularly related to BlackRock's iShares spot Bitcoin (IBIT) exchange-traded fund.

Total Bitcoin options open interest rose from $39 billion in December 2025 to $49 billion in December 2025, putting the covered call strategy under close watch.

Critics argue that by “renting” their money in fees, large investors have unwittingly created a ceiling that prevents Bitcoin from entering the next parabolic phase. To understand this argument, it helps to view a covered call as a trade-off between price appreciation and fixed income.

In a covered call strategy, an investor who already owns bitcoin sells a call (buy) option to another party. This gives the buyer the right to buy that Bitcoin at a fixed price, such as $100,000. In return, the seller receives a cash payment similar to receiving a bond interest.

This option strategy differs from fixed income products because the seller continues to hold fixed assets, although their potential is limited. If Bitcoin comes to $120,000, the seller must sell for $100,000, effectively losing the extra profit.

Traders argue that this stops volatile price action because professional traders who buy these options often sell bitcoins in the spot market to hedge their exposure, creating a constant “selling wall” at the popular strike prices.

Options-based production has replaced the fallen cash-and-trade.

This shift to option-based production is a direct response to cash collapse and carry trade, which involves selling BTC futures while holding a comparable position in the spot market.

By the end of 2024, dealers will command a 10% to 15% premium. But that premium fell below 10% in February 2025, and struggled to stay above 5% in November.

In search of higher returns, funds turned to covered calls, which offered more attractive annual yields of 12 to 18 percent. This shift is evident in IBIT options, which rose from $12 billion to $40 billion by the end of 2024, even as the call ratio remained stable at less than 60 percent.

If rampant “stressful” call selling was really the dominant force, this ratio would likely fall because the market is flooded with call sellers. Instead, the balance suggests that for every product-oriented seller, there is still a position for a buyer to breach.

The call-to-call ratio shows that while some participants are selling put put options, a much larger group is buying instruments to hedge against potential price declines.

The recent defensive position is reflected in the distortion measure. While IBIT is trading options at a 2% discount at the end of 2024, they now trade at a 5% premium. At the same time, implied volatility, a measure of the market's expected volatility, has fallen to 45% or lower since May, down from 57% by the end of 2024.

Lower volatility lowers the premium earned by sellers, meaning that the incentive to deploy this “suppression” strategy is effectively weakened as total open interest increases.

Arguing that the value of covered calls is declining makes little sense when sellers of those call options stand to gain more if their price rises to their target level. Instead of acting as a constraint, the options market has become the primary place where Bitcoin's volatility is monetized.

This article is not intended for general information purposes and should not be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. The views, ideas and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph shall not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this information.