In a new Robboby Forkuard report, I-Drive warns of cyber threats

What will it look like in the real world, not in the movies, when artificial intelligence takes off?

A new Rand Corporation simulation of romantic agents hacking digital systems, killing people, and if someone realizes what's going on.

The exercise report, which was published on Wednesday, warned that if leaders respond, they can quickly overwhelm the purchasing and decision-making systems.



Gregory Smith, who supports the reporter's policy, said that the exercise should know how to investigate such an event.

“I think that what is loaded in the question of the package is that the reactions of the players are sure that they were behind the offense,” Smith said. It means that international cooperation is crucial for the American government to be asked.

Because the participants could not decide whether the attack came from the state of society, terrorists or suicide Annie, they followed “very different and mutually compatible responses”.

Robot firepower

Rogue One has long been a staple of science fiction, from 2001's space odyssey to war and the cutting edge. But the idea quickly moved to a real policy issue. If physicists and IT researchers can reinvent themselves once, the question is not if we lost it, that is, how to control it.

A geopolitical mining center with artificial general intelligence can respond to the “robot” drop “in Los Angeles that kills 26 people and paralyzes them.”

As a two-hour table simulation on a platform that can be approved by Rend, it will contain current and former officials, current and former officials who are members of the Subject Committee of the National Consumer Council, and foreign experts.

Guided by the National Security Adviser, the participants did not learn the identity of the attacker, then independent intelligence agents were behind the massacre.

According to Michael Rust, the reporter who was written in secret, the scene was deliberately made to pray for a real world crisis, which is not immediately seen as a responsibility.

“We intentionally improvise to establish what a real situation looks like,” he said. If the attacker happens, and you don't immediately know why he came or why he came – this person will accept it immediately, while others may introduce that ambiguity in the decision-makers. “

The report determines this property – who or what is the attack to change policy responses? In the absence of a clear tendency, the authorities set out to pursue incompatible strategies.

In addition, the study showed that the participants were defeated in how to communicate with the public in such a crisis.

Our relationships should be given real attention in the midst of decisions that can affect what makes them think in public or act in a certain way. Smith says that the communication networks are rejecting in COSBARATATACK.

Wondering about the future

The Rafd team's exercise method is a type of “warrior killer” method.

“Water, power and internet systems are still vulnerable,” Smith said. If you can avoid essential infrastructure, keep it running and protect public health and safety, you can make it easier to answer.

“Crying” is added when thinking about “control or cyber incidents”. The most important thing is when it begins to affect the physical world. Cyber-Physical Interactions – Real-world impact robots feel important to include in the environment. “

Rand's exercise concluded that defensive awareness tools, infrastructure resilience, and crisis management are vulnerable to cyber threats. The report states that voluntary AI-advanced capabilities, in secure communication environments, are set up with foreign governments to procure them in a safe manner.

The most dangerous thing about Ug Ug may not be its code – but our confusion when it happens.