L1 is the new battlefield, and not even the playing field
Comment by: Rayy Song, APRIRIRE
Before long, you start to see patterns when markets exist. The tools we build and the machines we build are not static. One of the biggest shifts at the moment is in the main layer.
For years, the “Layer 1” conversation was under the control of ETEREREERED, Wilrem, if you want Solamenta, if you want sovereignty, if you want speed and cosmos, if you want it. The choice of L1 feels like a probe to evaluate business, liquidation and execution.
However, recently that decision has shifted from local to strategic. Big companies are now building their pool from scratch, apart from the builders of the ecological systems. And with the advantages of deep control and distribution of integrated companies, L1 will start playing independent playground and stop as if dead.
Soil clock time
Take the news of war. This “time” payments integrated cover 1 is being developed in collaboration with Bush. If you sell for a long time, you don't do this for no reason. This is a base payment, payments and later settlement-coverage game on the base.
In traditional markets, clearing and settlement are often invisible to end users, but they are the real representation. Temporarily predictable payments, trial settlement periods and no one can predict the spread of the trader. This 20-year-old muscle memory is applied to the synaptic cleft.
If they are allowed permission
There is a clear transparency. At one end, there are totally unconventional, censorship-resistant protocols. Although these chains are Polish or mandatory comfort institutions, but they are where true innovation occurs. In the early days of Emere, Biracon is still there, joining the edges of the new Kiki doors.
On the contrary, you have corporate controlled L1s that are aligned with the prescribed collodia and exchanges. Coinbase's base chain already exists. The BCN BNB chain is an effective computer system. Grup is joining this stage.
“CLEPTO-Indigenous people are able to attract people, but they are hyenas between grievances that are structured enough to maintain institutions. This middle ground is where some of the most interesting battles are fought – both sides can meet somewhere.
This is not a level playing field
Crypto-native founders can't compete with Worry or Carbase when it comes to distribution and regulatory terms. Great people can earn millions of traders overnight and with pia calls.
Related: Starccoin pressure, grips crystal wallet developer offensive
This does not make it hopeless for unlicensed builders, but it changes the game. At the same time erccors (licensing, distribution of institutions) compete head-on. It is an opportunity that the organization (corporation L1s) does not give or does not work.
You won't get priority privacy features that can trigger the regulatory eye, and you won't be able to travel in the novel Divities of the shipping novel that requires a legal sign like every new feature. They should always be balanced against the value of the shares.
A place where opportunities still exist
The most important games happened because anyone can plug into anyone's contracts without asking for permission. It is difficult to do with L1, which is controlled by the organization. If they can offer real incentives, they will draw fronts that they can't.
When taking unusual things to carry out a psychological evaluation, Crespto's natives can also experiment with autochemical models, or educational models or a combination.
Finally, people tend to forget how cultural alignment is when it comes to multi-cultural leadership. Etherum has an identity and Bitcoin has a mission. If it is consistent with the main basis of the opinion, even if privacy compounds, degrees or regional criminal membership, if you can read the vision of those who transmit the corporate L1s in those units.
The emergence of corporate L1s will change the speed map. If the follow-up schedule finds transit with the traders, for the days, the reserved strategies will see very good, high volume flows. Protocol changes, reigns, and market narratives can swing overnight in the form of unexpected events that still do not exist within the boundaries of demand.
The risks in the unregulated chain are technical and market. In the corporate chain, the risks are regulatory and business-model-specific. Time can't technically block you, but it can kill the product with a policy update.
Endsgame
This is not zero-sum between corporations and unsustainable chains. They complete each other. Corporate L1s handle large volume flows that lead to collateral chains.
Traders and builders alike, the real alpha is if you understand how to build between these rocks. The base layer is currently a real estate ribbon that resembles a statistical period of news signals. And whoever controls the animals in the markets will eventually control the killers.
Comment by: Rayy Song, Founder at Aprio.
This article is for general information purposes and should not be construed as legal or investment advice. The views, opinions and opinions expressed here are the author's alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Akantim Photography.
