Polygon Labs charts course decentralization

Polygon Labs Charts Course For Decentralized Governance


Share this article

An announcement read that Polygon Labs is advancing its governance strategy with the proposed Polygon 2.0 update to redefine blockchain network governance. As announced on July 19, this innovation roadmap plans to cover all blockchains and applications in the Polygon ecosystem, a three-tier system that manages its operations.

The first step in this model involves updating the Polygon Improvement Proposal (PIP) framework. By expanding the scope of the PIP, Polygon aims to provide an opportunity for all community members to propose and explore improvements to the protocols, developing diverse perspectives and insights that can be integrated into the system.

“The PIP framework is intended to eventually expand to cover the license-free polygon stack, providing a formal way for the community to research and propose improvements that may eventually become part of the protocols.”

Following this, the second phase, known as System Smart Contract Management, aims to simplify the process of protocol updates and smart contract software upgrades. A special council of community-elected representatives oversees these changes, “emphasizing the community's role in key operational decisions to arrive at a community-controlled governance model that ensures efficiency and security.”

Minergate

The final step involves establishing a community treasury. This mechanism is designed to stimulate the development of the Polygon ecosystem by providing funds for various projects. An independent board will initially oversee the treasury, with the goal of eventually transitioning to a community management model.

In two phases, Polygon will establish a Community Treasury Board aimed at promoting the development of Polygon through support and funding for ecological and public goods. Then, the second chapter focuses on the development of both the community treasury board and the treasury itself towards greater community governance.

“A variety of models and scenarios can be considered including, but not limited to: Quadratic token voting; Auto-sovereign identities to ensure Sybil resistance; Reputation-based decision-making, etc.

Share this article

The information on or included in this website is obtained from independent sources that we believe to be accurate and reliable, but we make no representations or warranties as to the timeliness, completeness or accuracy of any information on or accessible from this website. . Decentralized Media, Inc. Not an investment advisor. We do not provide personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may be out of date, or may be incomplete or incorrect. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete or inaccurate information.

You should not make an investment decision in an ICO, IEO or other investment based on the information on this website and you should never interpret or rely on any information on this website as investment advice. If you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO or other investment, we strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional. We do not receive compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.



Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest