The New York Times lawsuit has faced a backlash from OpenAI over ethical AI practices.

In a blog post on January 8, The New York Times (NYT) addressed the lawsuit, saying it was “to no avail,” detailing its cooperative efforts with various news organizations.

According to the blog post, OpenAI was “moving forward with construction” in a chat with the NYT.

“We are surprised and disappointed by the December 27 lawsuit that we learned from reading the New York Times.

The NYT lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft alleges that its unauthorized content was used to train artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots. OpenAI's disclaimer disagrees with the NYT's claim and says it sees this as a moment to clarify “our business, purpose and how we build our technology.”

He outlines four claims on which he bases his arguments, the first of which is that active collaboration with news organizations creates new opportunities for news.

He said the training was “fair use” but “opt-out” because it was “the right thing to do.” Additionally, the AI ​​developer says the “regurgitation” of the content is a “rare error” being corrected, and finally, the NYT says it's not telling the “whole story.”

OpenAI has named various partnerships in the media industry, such as a recent merger with German media giant Axel Springer to solve AI “nightmares.”

The News/Media Alliance is also named as the organization that is meeting to “explore opportunities, discuss concerns and provide solutions.”

Related: AI-Generated News Anchors to Deliver Personalized Reports on Channel 1 AI by 2024

But this comes after the News/Media Alliance published a 77-page paper on Oct. 30 that it submitted to the United States Copyright Office saying AI models trained on data sets that consume more content than other news publishers. Sources.

OpenAI also highlighted the “opt-out process” implemented for publishers, which prevents the tools from accessing the websites of the publishers employed. The New York Times reported receiving it in August 2023.

A key argument against OpenAI and Microsoft in the NYT case is that the “www.nytimes.com” website is the most represented source of copyright, second only to Wikipedia and the US Patent Documents Database.

The NYT says that in April 2023, there is no point in working with OpenAI and Microsoft to create threats to intellectual property and “explore the possibility of a peaceful resolution.”

Despite OpenAI's disclaimer, lawyers called the NYT case “the best case yet” that claims generative AI is infringing copyright.

Any abuse provided by the NYT would not be “normal or authorized user activity,” and the content is not “a substitute for The New York Times,” he said.

“Anyway, we're making our systems more resistant to enemy attacks to refresh training data, and we've made a lot of progress on our latest models.”

“We consider the New York Times' lawsuit without merit,” the article concluded, adding, “We remain committed to a constructive partnership with The New York Times and respect its longstanding history…”

Magazine: ‘AI killed the industry': EasyTranslate boss adapting to change