The Sam Bankman-Fried trial is telling the story of a classic financial fraud.

The courtroom drama surrounding FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has all the elements of an over-the-top Netflix series, filled with shady characters and a plot that thickens with each passing day. Among the main issues are the SBF's high presidential ambitions and $100-150 million in bribes to Chinese officials, adding to the narrative's self-aggrandizement.

If SBF set out to write a thrilling courtroom drama for his Netflix debut, he nailed it. However, when it comes to establishing his innocence, the plot leaves much to be desired.

The trial was electrified by testimony from Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda Research, FTX's trading arm. He resonated with a fierce honesty rare in such high trials. It was emotional and raw, honestly. A shocking revelation she shared was that the company had created seven fake accounts, which were set up for the SBF to choose the one that best served its agenda.

Related: It's Time for the SEC to Agree with Coinbase and Ripple

“When I started working at Alameda, I don't think you would have believed me if you told me I would be sending fake accounts to our creditors or taking customer money, but over time I became more comfortable. ” Ellison told the jury.

The jury doesn't seem to need a spoiler warning to predict the ending of this story. The overwhelming evidence points to a conviction, a calculus of risk that seems to elude SBF. This is not surprising since FTX's risk management was ultimately responsible for calculating the odds before the problem occurred.

Fun fact from the FTX trial: Caroline Ellison set up seven different fake accounts to send to Genesis after they demanded $500M back from Alameda and asked Sam to send them his favorite version of BS a la carte. In the end, Caroline says they don't care.

— Autism Capital (@AutismCapital) October 14, 2023

When the gavel finally falls, it's likely to echo the sentence handed down to Taranos founder Elizabeth Holmes — though she could easily get away with 11 years in prison. (He's facing a total of more than 100 years.) And the legal rollercoaster doesn't end here for the SBF, as a second trial is set to begin in March. The trial included six of the seven counts before the court today, including campaign finance violations.

Grifters go to scrapes. But what are the takeaways from this troubling saga?

There are profound lessons to be learned from the SBF experiment. While cryptocurrency has been hailed for its potential to redefine the financial ecosystem, the experiment is showing how traditional financial tricks can infiltrate the space, casting a long shadow over the revolutionary promise of blockchain technology.

While SBF awaits its fate in court, the crypto community will use this time to reflect, learn, and adjust to basic cryptographic ethics. The journey to self-sufficiency can be fraught with challenges, but it's a path to financial autonomy and empowerment.

SBF test seen earlier today: DOJ Bankman-Fried with Bill Clinton shows FTX clients' funds locked up via email, including one showing timeline parallel to 2022 UN General Assembly week 2022 at Clinton's initiative pic.twitter.com com/sxjwpvy9Vn

— Inner City Press (@innercitypress) October 18, 2023

As the hearing unfolds and the crypto world watches with bated breath, it serves as an incentive to dive in and return to the basics of self-governance and decentralization.

FTX's fall from grace was not the result of crypto's inherent flaws, but rather a classic story of financial fraud, which was merely a backdrop to the crypto landscape. The fraud was not unique to the crypto domain; A scene out of the traditional financial playbook was the age-old narrative of unscrupulous accounting meets fraud.

This experiment is not only a sensational topic; He is concerned about the dangers of moving away from the core principles of cryptography. The ethics of crypto is based on eliminating the middle man, which is in stark contrast to the narrative that SBF spins around the state.

While the founders of trusted crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken espouse the mantra “your coins, not your keys,” SBF advocates the opposite, urging investors to hand over their digital assets to him — perhaps because he plans to steal them.

RELATED: Michael Lewis's New Book Makes a Positive Turn on Sam Bankman-Fried

Lured by the chaos of convenience, many crypto investors have abdicated their responsibility to self-manage their assets, allowing SBF and pirates to steer the ship, to their detriment.

The traditional banking system, for all its simplicity and convenience, comes at a cost—risks of censorship, inflation, hidden fees, and delayed transactions. Self-preservation, like freedom, is not easy, it is hard. But crypto doesn't have to be easy. It's a financial revolution that aims to make you more independent and empowered. It's not a walk in the park; It is a revolution aimed at empowering individuals in the financial field.

This experiment represents a return to the fundamentals of the crypto community. It's time to revisit the writings of cypherpunk visionaries like Timothy May, Eric Hughes, and modern-day prophets like Vitalik Buterin and Nick Szabo.

Ignore the flashing ads, step aside from crypto clickbait, and take the time to understand the principles of hardware wallets and operational security. Delve into the ethos of cypherpunks, understand the essence of practical security, and make sure you're in the crypto space for the right reasons. The appeal of “numbers add up” and charismatic founders should never overshadow the fundamental principles that underlie cryptocurrencies.

This article is not intended for general information purposes and should not be construed as legal or investment advice. The views, ideas and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.