Why Bill Maher’s Bitcoin Criticism Misses Key Facts?

American comedian and writer Bill Maher sparked a heated debate about cryptocurrency in his comments on an HBO panel. They criticized the industry's environmental impact, a topic that has attracted much attention.

On X (formerly Twitter), which has more than 10 million followers, Maher's comments have been widely echoed, sparking a huge conversation.

Since its inception, Bitcoin has faced scrutiny from critics in various sectors. Often these advocates do not have a general understanding of the Bitcoin ecosystem, but their criticism continues.

Bill Maher is the latest public figure to enter the fray. He compared the environmental burden to adding about 15.7 million gas-powered cars to the road.

“Crypto uses 8% of all electricity. Their data centers, their mining, this number-crunching nonsense, I can't even go through the whole thing. It's ridiculous what crypto really is,” Maher said.

Read More: 5 Best Platforms to Buy Bitcoin Mining Shares After the 2024 Halving

In response, crypto enthusiasts at X were quick to dispute Maher's points. Pierre Rochard, vice president of research at Riot Platforms, disputed the claims, citing scientific evidence. According to him, Bitcoin mining does not emit carbon dioxide.

In a video posted by Riot Platforms, he backed up his claim by showing the low levels of carbon dioxide in a crypto mining facility compared to densely vegetated areas.

Moreover, there are forward-looking initiatives that seek to align crypto mining with environmental goals. For example, Agile Energy X, part of Japan's TEPCO, plans to use surplus energy for bitcoin mining.

Japan in 2010 If you reach the 50% renewable energy goal by 2050, 240,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity could go unused each year. Using just 10 percent of this profit would generate $2.5 billion worth of bitcoins per year.

In addition, recent data indicate promising trends in the industry's energy use. Currently, 56.72% of Bitcoin miners use renewable energy sources in their operations.

Read more: How Much Electricity Does Bitcoin Mining Use?

Bitcoin environment analyst Daniel Batten says this development is interesting. He cites studies in several peer-reviewed journals in the past that suggest bitcoin has positive environmental externalities.

“Of the last 11 peer-reviewed journals, 10 show that Bitcoin has positive environmental externalities, which resonates with grid operators, battery engineers, solar and wind generators, and methane reduction specialists,” Batten said.

This view was reinforced by a 2023 report by BeinCrypto, which argued that Bitcoin mining could be greener than the technology used in electric vehicles under certain circumstances. This claim strongly contradicts Maher's critical view and shows the progress being made in the cryptocurrency sector to address environmental concerns.