Lighter LIT Token divides the startup community into fair startups
Journalist
Hassan Shitu
Journalist
Share
One of the oldest on-chain exchanges, Liter, has sparked a heated debate in the DeFi community following the release of its newly announced Lighter Infrastructure Token, LIT Tokinomics.
The release raises new questions about what constitutes a fair start in an increasingly institutionalized chain derivatives market.
According to the protocol, 50% of LIT tokens are distributed to users, partners and development incentives, while the remaining 50% is reserved for the team and investors.
The lighter insider allocations are subject to a one-year gulf, with three years of straight coverage and 26% allocated to the group and 24% to investors.
Lighter distributes 25% LIT on launch, sparks Tokenomics debate
As part of the launch, Lighter has committed to airdrop distribution of half of its ecosystem allocation of 25% of its total supply through the first two point periods, extending through 2025.
Those programs generated 12.5 million points converted to LIT and distributed at launch. The remaining 25% of ecosystem tokens will be earmarked for future advocacy campaigns, partnerships and broader development efforts.
In a statement posted on X, Liter said that all value generated by LIT DEX and future services will go to token holders.
The company has stated that it operates from the US in a C-Corp structure, where the income from businesses and other products is visible on the chain and allocated between development initiatives and token purchases according to market conditions.
The ad immediately divided opinion, with some users appreciating the transparency around ownership and revenue allocation, with the structure being clean and clearly defined.
Others were critical, focusing on the size of the internal allocation and demanding that DeFi's native protocol allocate half of its supply to the team and investors, despite long locks.
Several posts described the split as excessive, while others argued that building a large-scale startup infrastructure would require significant capital and long-term support.
Following the launch of the public mainnet, the protocol raised $68 million and some community members questioned how that translated into a 24% investor allocation.
Independent calculations circulating on X indicate that the average price of the total dilution for the raise will be closer to $272 million, rather than the $1.5 billion headline quoted in later rounds, prompting further debate over pricing and dilution.
It emerges as a whirlwind of light perps levels
The controversy comes as Leiter continues to post strong trading metrics.
According to data from DeFillama, the platform handles about $4.3 billion in 24-hour perpetual volume, making it second only to Hyperliquid on a daily basis.
Additionally, Liter led all on-chain positions in 30-day volume at around $201 billion, surpassing both HyperLiquid and Aster.
Open interest, at around $1.45 billion, remains lower than some competitors, indicating a faster turnaround than a long-term hold.
Market data suggests that this pattern is more of a continuation than a breakthrough, as Liter held near its seven-day high, making it the preferred high-yield position by active traders.
The broader context in the distribution market provides context for the startup, with sustainable futures on the chain expected to exceed $1 trillion per month by 2025.
Decentralized spaces have taken a growing share of the activity, with platforms such as HyperLiquid, Aster and Liter emerging as dominant players.
Against that backdrop, reactions to LIT also played into trading behavior, with Blockchain analytics accounts tipped for big gains short positions shortly after Tokenome's announcement.
When Leiter showed a long-term whale address that increased to a large long position despite unexpected losses.
Trending news, recommended popular crypto topics, price predictions
