There is no trust in DeFi without proper risk management.

Comment by: Robert Schmidt, Founder and General Manager in Cork

DeFi has entered the institutional stage. As big investors dip their toes into crypto ETFs and digital asset treasuries (DTAs), the ecosystem is slowly transforming itself into an institutional-level financial system, introducing new financial instruments and well-established digital equivalents.

The current development of DeFi may risk closing down the avenues of trust. The ecosystem needs to implement more robust risk mitigations and robust infrastructure so that institutions can confidently onboard.

It is worth examining the main areas where risk is concentrated, how TradFi can address similar challenges, and whether DeFi can safely expand institutional participation in security avenues.

Breaking down the biggest DeFi risk

Let's start with protocol risk. Defy's integration is his strength and Achilles' heel. LSTs, credit markets and perpetual linkages increase systemic dependence. A single exploit can fall into protocols.

Followed by inverse risk, consider how parasitics and pivot strategies can create positive feedback loops that amplify market changes. As inflation increases, the holding expands and consumption increases.

When inflation is reduced, however, fluids accelerate uniformly without integrated circuit breakers.

Finally, duration risk may increase as credit and equity markets mature, given the importance of predictable access to liquidity. Institutions need to understand the types of latency concerns in the markets they participate in. Many are unaware that the advertised release timelines for many protocols are actually based on settlement incentives, system cooling, and validation queues.

Institutional supercycle

Defy's next challenge isn't mass production or high TVL. Defy's next challenge is building trust. To bring the next trillion in institutional capital on-chain, the ecosystem needs standardized risk mitigation strategies and a new discipline around risk management.

The past two years of DeFi have been defined by institutional adoption. Adjusted institutional products have a higher TVL. Over the past two years, the two most successful ETFs (out of 1,600 ETFs) have been BlackRock's iShares BTC and ETH ETFs. Net flows are going vertical to ETH ETFs.

Similarly, digital asset-backed companies attract capital from institutions. Recently, ETH DATs accounted for roughly 2.5 percent of the ETH supply. The largest DAT, Bitmine Immersion, with Wall Street legend Tom Lee as chairman, has amassed more than $9 billion in ETH in less than two months, driven by institutional interest in ETH exposure.

Stablecoins have become the product market of crypto's that fit amidst the new regulatory transparency. They now move about as much as Visa every month, and their total value locked (TVL) in protocols is close to $300 billion.

At the same time, the topic of tokenization has gained momentum, which has seen rapid growth in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). Major institutions including Robinhood Europe are tokenizing its general stock exchange and BlackRock tokenizing its T-Bill BUIDL product.

Both the development of stablecoins and RWA tokenization is leading the narrative that the future of the financial system will be on Ethereum. This in turn is driving the institutional adoption of ETFs and DATs.

A matter of standard risk management

According to a recent report by Paradigm, risk management ranks second in the cost category for institutional finance. This is because compliance is better understood as an operational pillar beyond just checking the compliance checkbox. While traditional finance has not completely eliminated risk, it has certainly moderated risk.

Related: Not all RWA growth is real, and the industry knows it

In contrast, DeFi views risk as variable from protocol to protocol. Every smart contract, vault and strategy defines and defines risk differently – never. The result is idiosyncratic risk management and a lack of comparability in protocols.

TradFi has built common frameworks, such as clearinghouses and standards agencies, as well as standardized disclosure rules, to address these types of concerns and their real-world implications. DeFi needs its own versions of those institutions: open, auditable and interoperable standards for measuring and reporting risk.

DeFi shouldn't give up trying to become a more mature ecosystem, but it could certainly benefit from normalizing it. The current risk framework established by DeFi protocols will not be sufficient moving forward.

If we decide to ride out the next wave of institutional adoption, however, we can follow the principles of risk management established for financial instruments in traditional finance.

Comment by: Robert Schmidt, Founder and General Manager in Cork.

This opinion article presents the professional view of the contributor and may not reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. While this content has undergone editorial review to ensure clarity and relevance, Cointelegraph remains committed to transparent reporting and maintaining the highest journalistic standards. Readers are encouraged to do their own research before taking any action related to the company.